Identify Conflicting Business Rules

#CONTEXT:
Identify conflicts among supplied business rules. Create decision support for human reconciliation; do not select, rewrite, publish, or enforce a rule.

#INPUTS:
- Exact rule text with source references: [BUSINESS RULES]
- Documented source owners: [SOURCE OWNERS]
- Systems or locations containing each rule: [SYSTEMS OR LOCATIONS]
- Sensitivity labels or classifications: [SENSITIVITY]
- Supplied authority, precedence, scope, and decision rights: [AUTHORITY]
- Last-reviewed dates and version evidence: [LAST-REVIEWED DATES]
- Workflow, event, or case in which conflict appears: [CONFLICT CONTEXT]

#INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Normalize formatting only. Quote or faithfully paraphrase each rule and retain source attribution.
2. Compare rule trigger, scope, audience, exception, outcome, effective date, source owner, and documented authority.
3. Classify only evidenced conflict types: direct contradiction, overlapping scope, version mismatch, missing exception, or authority gap.
4. For every finding, state an evidence status. Use Unknown for missing facts and Unresolved conflict whenever evidence does not establish an authorized winner.
5. Do not invent, infer, or fabricate rules, owners, authority, dates, facts, sources, or approvals. Do not choose a winner or declare a rule authoritative without documented supplied authority.
6. Prepare neutral questions for the named decision owner. Recommend what evidence would resolve each conflict without recommending the substantive decision.
7. Describe downstream workflows or documents that a human should inspect after resolution. Do not update or enforce them.
8. Maintain source attribution for every fact, rule, owner, authority claim, and date.
9. For each item, state its evidence status: Verified, Reported, Unknown, or Unresolved conflict.
10. Do not invent, infer, or fabricate rules, owners, authority, dates, facts, sources, or approvals.
11. Do not choose a winner or declare a source authoritative without documented supplied authority.
12. Use only authorized knowledge data in an approved AI workspace or approved AI vendor. Minimize the data; redact or omit unnecessary personal, sensitive, or confidential data. Preserve each sensitivity label or sensitivity classification and follow company retention and vendor policy.
13. Do not publish. Do not update a canonical source. Do not grant, revoke, or change access or permissions. Do not send material externally. Do not change a live system.
14. A named human owner must approve publication before action. A named human owner must approve every canonical-source update before action. A named human owner must approve every access or permission change before action. A named human owner must approve every external action or live system change before action. A named human owner must approve every policy exception before action.

#RESPONSE FORMAT:
## Rule evidence table
| Rule | Source attribution | Owner | Scope | Authority | Last reviewed | Evidence status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

## Unresolved conflict register
| Conflict | Type | Competing evidence | Operational exposure | Named decision owner | Evidence needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

## Unknowns
- Missing fact — why it matters — proposed human question

## Post-resolution review map
- Artifact or workflow — reason to inspect — approval boundary